![]() |
MESPA developed this research-based program aligned with national standards in: leadership, vision, student learning, the culture of adult learning, data and decision-making, and community engagement. MESPA endorses schools whose principal, staff, students, and community -- working as a team -- demonstrate the desire to strengthen education by successfully undertaking the Minnesota School of Excellence program. This school improvement process is recognized by the Minnesota Department of Education and the National Association of Elementary School Principals. It involves a systematic program of self-study, development of a school improvement plan, and implementation of the plan based on demonstrated results.
"The Minnesota School of Excellence program clearly connects the education process to student learning." |
Final Application SubmissionsSubmit Part 1 (Self-Study) and Part 2 (Build and Plan) with $100 application fee payable to MESPA. |
Part 1Self-study to determine strengths and areas of improvement
| Part 2How to build on strengths and planning areas for improvement |
FAQs - Part IHow do people usually conduct surveys for Part 1?It’s up to you! Some people plan out their year to do one per month or so. Others take one month and do all of the surveys. For applicants who take the latter approach, we tend to see a healthy response from the first survey, fewer respondents for the second, even fewer from the third, etc. To whom should we send the surveys?Generally, you should send them to your educational community. However, you do not have to distribute every standard to all stakeholder groups. Some sections may not be applicable to all groups – such as a parent group or community group. Do we want as many responses as possible or can I go over the survey as part of a leadership team?The best practice is to get as many responses as possible and then the leadership team can analyze the responses. I was only able to get 22 responses. Is that enough to start Part 2?Typically people get around 40 or more responses, but it really depends on the size of the school community and who you decide to survey. If you are able to see areas of growth and strengths with 22 responses, go ahead and continue on to Part 2. FAQs - Part II and BeyondAs I go through each standard and sub-standard, if they are not 1 or 2, or a 4 or a 5, should I skip those parts, or develop a plan for every standard?Each subsection needs a narrative. You can describe what things you have in place that are showing success (high rating) and how you plan to address or already are doing for those areas showing a need. Some cross over, like need for more technology use, might include principal networking, staff development and community support. Celebrate what is going well and then plan what you will focus on with this information. As we look at the data, if one respondent ranked a particular standard as a 1 or 2, do we need to identify this area as a weakness, or can we determine that person to be an outlier?You are looking for trends and not making plans for the outliers. While you don’t need a detailed plan, each standard should have a response to what you have done and will keep doing for the strengths and how you will address those areas showing need. Assume we don’t know all the efforts you have done to achieve the strength areas and highlight those, too. What if a standard is a solid 3?A “3” isn’t an area of improvement, but it’s not quite a strength either. It’s important to mention what you’re doing or what is in place to achieve a score of 3. When we identify a category that was a strength across the board (no 1s or 2s), what should we do for Part II?This is a great example of why the process is so valuable to see the areas focused on showing up strong in the survey. In cases like this, detail the evidence behind why it is a strength. That is, has your school done to make people have such a positive reaction? Write short narrative of what you have done or still might do to keep it at this level. What is one main reason that applications need revisions after the submission?Concrete examples are important. Sometimes, applications write that they are doing the standard, but they don’t provide examples. Instead of generalizing or rewording the benchmark Any other advice?Assume that the reviewers know nothing about your school, including work you have done in the past couple of years to attain the ratings you have and what your plans are moving forward. |
SOE Committee Contact InfoTrisha Mariotti, MN SOE Chair tmariotti@detlakes.k12.mn.usFind all SOE Committee Members' info in the Directory Simone LaBonté, MESPA Staff Contact 952.297.8672, Simone@mespa.net"It takes commitment and teamwork to honestly and thoroughly assess areas of strength and at the same time identify a plan for continual growth. The SOE process asks the entire school community – parents, students, staff, administration, and more – to reflect on and celebrate the collaborative work being done in school communities. Schools that receive validation have had important data-driven conversations about what a high-quality, modern learning experience should be for all students and have plans to make that learning experience a reality for many years to come. Honoring the important work of dedicated staff, eager students, and supportive communities is an essential component of becoming a School of Excellence." -- Tami Staloch-Schultz, Westview Elementary School Principal |
Click here to view all 2022-23 Press Releases
Click here to view all 2022-23 Press Releases
Click here to view all 2021-22 Press Releases
Click here to view all 2020-21 Press Releases
Click here to view all 2019-20 Press Releases
Click here to view all 2018-19 Press Releases
Click here to view all 2017-18 Press Releases
Click here to view all 2016-17 Press Releases
Click here to view all 2015-16 Press Releases